August 2013

In a recent case, the decision for which was rendered in April 2013, the Syndicat des travailleuses et travailleurs de Loto-Québec (CSN) (the “Union”) had filed a grievance against Loto-Québec (the “Employer”) challenging the contents of a medical examination and questionnaire. This grievance was ultimately dismissed.

The facts of the case

The UK saw a number of changes to employment law which came into force on 29 July.

One of the most significant changes is the introduction of fees for submitting a claim to the employment tribunal.   Claimants who issue a claim against their employer in the employment tribunal will now be required to pay a

This post was also contributed by Nikola Pamler, Trainee, Norton Rose Fulbright LLP (Munich)

Temporary employment is an important tool for many German companies, as hiring a temporary workforce allows companies to adjust easily and quickly to workload fluctuations without being constrained by restrictive German employment laws.  

That is why the “temporary industry” is constantly

This article was written by partner Dino Wilkinson and legal consultant Salma Peacock.

Outsourcing is a practice used by organisations to reduce costs by transferring portions of work or business functions to third party providers rather than providing the service in-house.

This transfer of portions of work or internal business functions to external suppliers has

This post was contributed by Shelagh Burrowes, Associate, Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP (Calgary)

Restrictions placed on former employees by way of restrictive covenants, such as non-solicitation and non-competition agreements, may be imposed only if there is a genuine need to protect the employer’s interests and will be subject to close judicial scrutiny.  Whether

This post was contributed by Peter MacTavish, Associate, Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP (Ottawa) and Brittany Hinds, summer student, Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP (Ottawa)

A recent arbitral decision invalidating the Ottawa Hospital’s restrictions on employee piercings and tattoos is yet another reminder that employers must have objective evidence to support the implementation of