Workpac granted leave to appeal Rossato judgment

By Helene Lee and Electra Dow on November 26, 2020 Posted in General

On 26 November 2020, the High Court granted a special leave application made by labour hire company Workpac to appeal the Full Federal Court’s finding in the matter of Workpac Pty Ltd v Rossato [2020] FCAFC 84 (Rossato) which was handed down earlier this year. In Rossato, the Court held that a casual employee engaged on a regular, systemic and predictable basis was entitled to leave entitlements, plus payment for public holidays, as set out in the National Employment Standards (NES) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) and, controversially, that Workpac was not entitled … Continue Reading

Western Australia set for WHS Reform

By Katherine Morris, Annika Martz and Shannon Walker on November 26, 2020 Posted in Australia, General

The Work Health and Safety Bill 2019 (WA) received assent on 10 November 2020 (WHS Act). The WHS Act introduces the offence of industrial manslaughter and will harmonise WA’s work health and safety (WHS) laws with most other Australian states and territories. This harmonisation is long overdue in WA with the other states and territories having adopted the model WHS laws between 2011 and 2012, with the exception of Victoria which has nonetheless still amended its legislation to provide for industrial manslaughter.

The WHS Act is expected to come into full effect in the first half of 2021 … Continue Reading

California imposes new requirement of a COVID-19 Prevention Program

By Josh Henderson (US) on November 25, 2020 Posted in Coronavirus, United States

With the approval of Cal/OSHA’s new COVID-19 regulations, the proponents of action-taking won out over those who felt California’s existing laws, regulations, and enforcement arsenal were sufficient to meet the moment. It’s clear that California likes to lead—though it’s not the first state to enact specific COVID-19 standards (Virginia and Oregon got there first).… Continue Reading

Transfert partiel d’entreprise : les errements de la Cour de cassation

By Laure Joncour on November 25, 2020 Posted in France

Dans une décision du 30 septembre 2020, la Cour de cassation revient une nouvelle fois sur le sort des salariés transférés dans le cadre d’un transfert partiel d’entreprise.

Lorsqu’une partie de l’activité d’une entreprise est transférée à un repreneur, il convient de vérifier si les salariés transfèrent également à ce repreneur. Aux termes de l’article L1224-1 du Code du travail, le contrat de travail des salariés attachés à cette activité est automatiquement transféré au repreneur si une entité économique autonome est transférée.

L’entité économique autonome est définie par une jurisprudence constante comme un ensemble organisé de personnes et d’éléments corporels … Continue Reading

US: California employers must take measures to curb workplace spread of coronavirus under emergency CAL/OSHA rules

By Josh Henderson (US) and Jackie Karama (US) on November 22, 2020 Posted in Coronavirus, North America, United States

The California Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board has approved emergency, temporary COVID-19 regulations under California’s Occupational Safety & Health Act. California employers must now establish specific measures to curb the spread of COVID-19 in nearly every workplace in California. The emergency regulations, which the Standards Board approved on Thursday night by a unanimous vote, must first be submitted to the Office of Administrative Law (OAL) for final approval. Upon submission, the OAL will have only 10 calendar days to approve or deny the proposed emergency regulations. If approved, the OAL will file the emergency regulation with the Secretary of … Continue Reading

Effectuer des enquêtes en milieu de travail… pendant une pandémie

By Taryn Mackie on November 19, 2020 Posted in Canada, Coronavirus

Cette année, les employeurs ont dû relever d’innombrables défis, notamment celui d’effectuer efficacement une enquête en milieu de travail alors que les protocoles de santé et sécurité exigent un certain degré de séparation. Heureusement, les règles de base pour les employeurs sont les mêmes, que ceux-ci effectuent une enquête en respectant une distance de deux mètres ou virtuellement sur Zoom.

Ne retardez pas (indûment) : Avec le temps, les souvenirs s’effacent et les arbitres peuvent interpréter les retards comme un signe que les agissements ne sont pas pris au sérieux ou qu’ils sont tolérés. Cependant, cela ne signifie pas que

Conducting Workplace Investigations… in a Pandemic

By Taryn Mackie on November 19, 2020 Posted in Canada, Coronavirus

This year has created innumerable challenges for employers— including the challenge of how to effectively conduct a workplace investigation when health and safety protocols demand a certain degree of separation. Fortunately, the same Do’s and Don’ts still apply to employers, whether they are conducting an investigation two meters apart or virtually through Zoom.

Don’t (inexcusably) delay: Memories fade over time and adjudicators may interpret delay as a sign that the conduct is insignificant or that the conduct is condoned. This does not mean that investigations need to be rushed, however— on the contrary, hasty investigations can be equally fatal. Best

L’obligation d’accommodement raisonnable à la suite d’une fusion d’entreprises au Québec : du maintien du lien d’emploi à la sauvegarde des conditions de travail

By Ione Deda Alves and Megda Belkacemi on November 18, 2020 Posted in Canada, Québec

Dans une décision rendue le 2 juillet 2020^[1], la Cour d’appel du Québec (la Cour d’appel) statue que l’obligation d’accommodement raisonnable ne devrait pas se limiter au maintien du lien d’emploi, mais qu’elle devrait plutôt tendre à offrir au salarié – sans toutefois lui garantir – des conditions de travail similaires et des gains comparables à ceux de son emploi originel, et ce, dans la mesure où cela n’impose pas à l’employeur une contrainte excessive. Il convient de préciser que cette décision a été rendue dans un contexte particulier de fusion d’entreprises, de sorte que, dans l’issue … Continue Reading

Long-awaited relief for federally regulated employers: Layoff periods extended further

By Stéphane Erickson on November 17, 2020 Posted in Canada, Coronavirus

To give federally regulated employers more time to recall employees due to the COVID-19 pandemic, certain layoff periods under the Canada Labour Standards Regulations have (again) been temporarily extended as of November 9, 2020, as follows:

Employee laid off before March 31, 2020

Three-month layoff: If an employee is laid off for a period of three months or less before March 31, 2020, the period is extended by nine months after the date on which it would otherwise end. As a result, the employer has 12 months to recall the employee before the layoff is deemed a termination of employment.

Un soulagement très attendu pour les employeurs sous réglementation fédérale : nouvelle prolongation des périodes de mise à pied

By Stéphane Erickson on November 17, 2020 Posted in Canada, Coronavirus

Dans le but de donner aux employeurs sous réglementation fédérale plus de temps pour rappeler les employés mis à pied en raison de la COVID-19, certaines périodes de mise à pied en vertu du Règlement du Canada sur les normes du travail ont (de nouveau) été temporairement prolongées, et ce, à compter du 9 novembre. Voici les points à retenir:

Employé mis à pied avant le 31 mars 2020