Books, hotels, restaurants, products: you can find reviews and rating websites for just about everything on the internet – even employers. However, employees posting internet reviews of their employer should be careful and measured in what they say, or risk being subjected to disciplinary measures – or even dismissal – if they abuse their freedom
May 2018
The GDPR – What does it mean for Employers?
You cannot fail to have noticed that the GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation ((EU) 2016/679)) came into force today. The Data Protection Act 2018 received Royal Assent on 23 May and ensures that the standards set out in the (GDPR) have effect in the UK.
The GDPR affects the processing of employment data – but…
When is disclosure of conciliation proceedings allowed?
Shortly after the dawn of our democracy, our labour law regime was completely overhauled with the enactment of the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 (LRA). The vision for this legislation was to provide simple procedures for the resolution of labour disputes. This was not simply for expediency; it was in the context…
Italian labour court hands down landmark decision on Foodora case with potentially far-reaching implications for any company active in Italy’s growing Gig economy
On May 7, 2018 the Labour Court of Turin handed down a landmark decision in a case brought by delivery bike drivers or couriers (“riders”) working for Foodora, an online food delivery company that offers meal delivery in 10 countries worldwide, including Italy.
Amongst other things, the riders, each with a freelance work contract with…
UK Government releases final report on the Independent Review of Building Regulations and Fire Safety
On 17 May 2018, the UK Government released the Independent Review of Building Regulations and Fire Safety: Final Report.
The report sets out a new regulatory framework to address the weaknesses identified in the interim report.
New York City employers take note: New anti-sexual harassment laws enacted
On May 9, 2018, New York City enacted a number of laws addressing sexual harassment in the workplace. The laws are summarized below. New York City employers who do not yet have anti-harassment and anti-retaliation policies in place should promptly begin the process for adopting them. New York City employers should also begin to make arrangements for providing their employees with anti-harassment training (upon hire and annually thereafter). Such training is now required under both New York State and New York City law. New York State’s law, which was also recently enacted, will become effective first. For a brief discussion of the recent New York State legislation, please see our prior blog post, New York State’s new sexual harassment prevention laws will require action by all New York employers.
Anti-Sexual Harassment Training
Beginning April 1, 2019, New York City employers with 15 or more employees (which includes interns for purposes of this new law) must provide anti-sexual harassment training to all of their New York City employees on an annual basis. The training must also be provided to new hires (who will work more than 80 hours per year) during the first 90 days of their employment. The training must address the following items (at a minimum):
- an explanation that sexual harassment is a form of unlawful discrimination under New York City, New York State, and federal law;
- a description, using examples, of what constitutes sexual harassment;
- a description of the employer’s internal procedures for reporting claims of sexual harassment;
- a description of the complaint process available through the New York City Commission on Human Rights, the New York State Division of Human Rights, and the United State Equal Employment Opportunity Commission for reporting claims of sexual harassment, including contact information for each agency;
- a statement that retaliation under the New York City human rights law is prohibited, and examples of prohibited retaliation;
- information regarding bystander intervention, including resources that explain how to engage in bystander intervention; and
- a description of the specific responsibilities of supervisory and managerial employees in the prevention of sexual harassment and retaliation, and measures that such employees can take to appropriately address complaints of sexual harassment.
Also, the training must be “interactive.” However, the new law is clear that the training need not be in-person or live in order to be considered interactive. The New York City Commission on Human Rights will be developing an on-line training module that can be used by employers to satisfy this training requirement, as long as employers supplement the module with a description of their internal complaint procedures.
The law requires employers to maintain records of all trainings provided, including signed employee acknowledgements, for at least three years.
New York City employers should be aware that this New York City training requirement is in addition to, and not in lieu of, the recently enacted New York State sexual harassment training requirement. New York City employers should ensure that their training modules satisfy both state and city requirements, to the extent applicable. To read a copy of our recent client alert summarizing the New York State requirement, please see our prior legal update, New York employers should get ready to comply with New York State’s new sexual harassment prevention laws.
Information sheet for employees
Effective September 6, 2018, all New York City employers must provide employees at the time of hire with an information sheet on sexual harassment. This information sheet will be developed by the New York City Commission on Human Rights and may be included in the employer’s employee handbook.
Bill 6 looks to broaden leave entitlements in British Columbia
On April 9, 2018, BC’s Minister of Labour introduced Bill 6, the Employment Standards Amendment Act, to the BC Legislature. Bill 6 includes proposed amendments to the Employment Standards Act (“ESA”) to bring certain types of leave into line with the Federal government’s recent changes to the Employment Insurance Act so that employees are…
Singapore: Legal issues commonly faced by freelancers and self-employed individuals
An estimated 8 to 10% of Singapore’s existing workforce comprise freelancers and self-employed individuals.[1] This percentage is likely to increase with the expansion of the gig and on-demand economy. In recent months, there has been increasing public concern as to the ‘employment’ rights and legal status of these freelancers and self-employed individuals. Are they…
EAT holds that paying enhanced maternity pay, but only statutory shared parental pay, is capable of amounting to indirect sex discrimination
In the UK, only female employees are eligible for statutory maternity leave. They are also eligible for statutory maternity pay at a fixed rate during such leave subject to certain conditions – and it is common for employers to pay enhanced maternity pay during periods of maternity leave.
Whilst many employers do not pay enhanced…
Visual contracts: Re-imagining the employment contract
We had the pleasure of assisting global engineering and infrastructure advisory company Aurecon become the first employer to launch a visual employment contract across its workforce in Australia.
The brief? To assist in re-imagining the standard written employment contract into an interactive and vibrant agreement, which governs the employment relationship and embodies the culture and…