September 2016

Employer clients often ask during a wrongful or constructive dismissal lawsuit what damages may be awarded.  One relevant consideration  is the common law duty to mitigate.  A wrongfully dismissed employee has a duty to mitigate his or her damages by attempting to find alternate employment.  The question of whether an employee has met his or

Unlike in the U.K. and other EU member states, zero hours contracts are not (yet) common practice in Germany. To date, other arrangements aimed at achieving “flexible working” such as fixed-term or part-time contracts, secondment of personnel and – more recently – contracts to provide services have been more widespread. However, as German case law

In order to best protect the employer’s commercial interests and competitiveness, it is often crucial to include restrictive covenants in employment contracts. It is of equal importance to ensure that these covenants respect the limits established in the case law for them to be enforceable by the courts. Indeed, they may be deemed null and

Financial risks when using foreign workers in the Netherlands

Hiring contractors or temporary employment agencies that employ foreign workers in the Netherlands, can create financial risks of which you should be aware. If foreign workers carry out activities for the benefit of your business, you should comply with legal obligations under the Foreign Nationals Employment

Subject to limited exclusions, employees will have access to the unfair dismissal regime under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (FW Act) if their annual rate of earnings is less than the high income threshold. Currently the high income threshold is $138,900.

For the purpose of assessing whether the high income threshold applies in relation to the dismissal of an employee at a particular time, certain payments applied or dealt with on behalf of the employee are included.

A recent full bench decision of the Fair Work Commission in Savannah Nickel Mines Pty Ltd v Crowley [2016] FWCFB 2630 held that an employer’s payment of a death cover insurance premium was included for the purpose of assessing whether the high income threshold applied to the employee involved.

It is generally accepted that the common law will imply a term of “reasonable notice” into a contract of employment which makes no provision for termination notice.  However, this general rule was displaced by the case of Brennan v Kangaroo Island Council [2013] SASCFC 151 which found that reasonable notice may not be implied in circumstances where an employee is covered by a modern award which prescribes a period of termination notice.  Recent cases have considered whether s 117 of the Fair Work Act 2009, which prescribes a minimum period of termination notice, should also displace the general rule.  Whilst this was supported by the South Australian District Court in Kuczmarski v Ascot Administration P/L [2016] SADC 65, in the more recent case of McGowan v Direct Mail and Marketing Pty Ltd [2016] FCCA 2227 Judge McNab of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia (FCCA) confirmed that s 117 provides minimum periods of termination notice only, and consequently does not displace a right to implied reasonable notice.