On 28 March 2025, the Labour Court delivered its decision in Makombe v Cape Conference of the Seventh-day Adventists. The court held that the claimant pastor was constructively dismissed – even though she resigned of her own accord. The judgment confirms that an employer can be held liable not only for direct mistreatment, but
Die Parteien streiten um die Anrechnung böswillig unterlassenen anderweitigen Verdienstes auf Verzugslohnansprüche. Der Kläger war als Senior Consultant seit November 2019 bei der Beklagten beschäftigt. Die Beklagte kündigte das Arbeitsverhältnis
The parties were in dispute over the defendant’s deduction of “omitted alternative income” from the employee’s claims for
Dans une décision récente[1], le Tribunal administratif du travail (le TAT), a accueilli la plainte d’un salarié (le Plaignant) pour congédiement sans cause juste et suffisante, confirmant que son congédiement était injustifié. Cette affaire met en lumière l’importance pour un employeur de démontrer un lien objectif entre une condamnation criminelle et
Die Parteien streiten um die
Dans une décision récente[1], le Tribunal administratif du travail (TAT) a rejeté la plainte d’un salarié (le Plaignant) pour congédiement sans cause juste et suffisante, confirmant que son congédiement était justifié. Cette affaire met en lumière l’importance des valeurs d’inclusion et de respect au sein des entreprises, et souligne les
During the height of the 2020 Covid-19 pandemic, the employer, Concrete Lining Products, decided to close down operations from 25 March to 16 April 2020 whilst continuing to pay its employees in full for that period, with the amount paid to be offset against the employees’ annual leave for days not worked.
The applicant
Introduction
Recently, Superior Court of Quebec Judge Claude Dallaire confirmed that employees who work remotely for a foreign employer may be unable to seek reinstatement in the event of unjust dismissal[1].
Because other jurisdictions generally award monetary damages instead of reinstatement in case of unjust dismissal, this decision may not be particularly surprising
Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act (Act) gives employees the right to form unions, bargain collectively and to “engage in other concerted activities for the purpose of … mutual aid or protection”. Speaking out about conditions of employment on behalf of a group of employees would fall within this protection. And, section 8
By way of background, before the entry into force of the “Macron scale”, in the case of unfair dismissal, it was for the judge in each case to set the amount of compensation for the loss suffered by the employee and the law did not set any maximum amount. This meant that judges were able